The 1600’s greatest strength is its ability to overclock. However, at 1080p, 1600 should exceed 120 frames per second, while the 10900k should exceed 200 frames per second.
At 1080p, you’ll experience an increasing blockage of around 35%. This represents a 15%–20% bottleneck in comparison to the 10900k. Therefore, at 4k, you should still achieve around 60 frames per second with the Ryzen 1600. The higher the resolution, the less bottleneck there will be. Additionally, why would anyone spend $700 on a GPU for a $150 CPU? The CPU is far more critical than the GPU in terms of overall system performance, resulting in an unbalanced system. However, given that the RTX 3080 is supposed to be significantly faster than the RTX 2080TI, I expect you’ll encounter a bottleneck. Probably, the Rywill work well with up to an RTX 2080TI.
However, you can upgrade your CPU and RAM defensively later on. While there may be a bottleneck, you should still be able to play AAA games at 1440p at 60 to 50 frames per second, depending on your power delivery and RAM. Due to the R5 1600’s low core performance, you’ll get significantly better results with a newer CPU. In most cases, Intel’s powerful Core i7 quad-core processors are faster in this case. AMD attributes the issue to a lack of optimizations by game developers. The Zen-based processor is not entirely convincing in games. They are divided into two clusters of three cores, each with its dedicated 元 cache, connected via Infinity Fabric. The chip’s six native cores are advantageous. The performance is awe-inspiring in applications. All six cores operate at a maximum clock speed of 3.4 GHz.
The Ryprocessor operates at a base frequency of 3.2 GHz and can turbo boost to 3.6 GHz (up to two cores) or 3.7 GHz via XFR (also up to 2 seats). It was the second-fastest Ryzen 5 processor in early 2017, but its 65-watt TDP is significantly lower than the faster Ryzen 5 1600X. AMD Ryis a six-core desktop processor with Hyper-Threading (SMT = twelve threads).